hornet ha scritto:
Ammiraglio Byrd
Ancora Byrd
Vincent51 ha scritto:
Citazione:
hornet ha scritto:
Ammiraglio Byrd
Ancora Byrd
direi di specificare che si tratta di racconti di fantascienza...
non ce ne sarebbe bisogno ma visto il livello di disprezzo nei confronti di LC del maestro di vita Attivissimo e dei suoi seguaci, mi permetto di suggerire di non fornire spunti.
hornet ha scritto:
sempre che siano racconti di fantascienza
Vincent51 ha scritto:
Citazione:
hornet ha scritto:
sempre che siano racconti di fantascienza
non cominciare eh!! Complottista che non sei altro!
tommasso ha scritto:
..linka anche questo documento che massimo gli ha mandato
http://www.attivissimo.net/11settembre/recensioni/hollowall.doc
Teknomaker ha scritto:
Vista la VERA STORIA, ossia tutto quello che assolutamente evitano di scrivere nei libri ufficiali, ritengo sia sciocco scartare ipotesi solo perchè all'apparenza fantasiose: basta ricordare un attimo la cartina di PIRI REIS, ammirgaglio della marina turca ottomana. La cartina, trovata 300 anni prima che si potesse anche solo abbozzare la costa dell'Antardide (nel 1500), rappresenta la costa dell'Antardide...senza la copertura di ghiaccio! Quanti mila anni fa l'antardide NON era coperto dal ghiaccio?
Ovviamente questi sono dettagli che sfuggono agli attivissimo di turno...
marcuzzzo ha scritto:
falso! è una copia delle mappe di colombo e in più quello che vedi in basso è il sudamerica non il polo sud...
falso! è una copia delle mappe di colombo e in più quello che vedi in basso è il sudamerica non il polo sud...
Manthrax ha scritto:
Citazione:
marcuzzzo ha scritto:
falso! è una copia delle mappe di colombo e in più quello che vedi in basso è il sudamerica non il polo sud...
Ancora qui sei tu?
Ancora non mi hai trovato un link in cui Massimo Mazzucco dica "Noi viviamo in una terra cava?".
Dai che lo sto aspettado..
Tubo ha scritto:
In realtà Massimo ha detto anche recentemente di credere che viviamo in una terra cava...
Quanto meno lo ha fatto intendere chiaramente.
TRovate questa sua affermazione:" stavo per sprofondare al centro della Terra, dove tra l'altro mi trovo abitualmente" ( più o meno cosi),
ma qualcuno sarebbe in grado di dire se veramente la pensa cosi'
Tubo ha scritto:
Ma poi, se la Terra fosse cava, in cosa sarebbe contenuta?
Adesso Massimo non c'è, perchè si è assentato per qualche giorno, ma qualcuno sarebbe in grado di dire se veramente la pensa cosi', cioè che viviamo in una Terra cava?
Quindi le stelle sono più vicine di New York?
??? Boh..
Sembra ragionevole?
hornet ha scritto:
La teoria è che sia cava, con un sole interno e una civiltà molto più avanzata di noi che ci vive.
6-th, 2001 - 19: 0
Theory into Fact: Gravity, Magnetic Poles & Ringing Bells
The father of The Hollow Earth Theory Marshall B. Gardner says:
“In gravitational pull it is not the geometrical position that counts. Center, in the geometrical sense of the word, does not apply. It is the mass that attracts. And if the great mass of the earth is in its thick shell, it is the mass of that shell that will attract, and not a mere geometrical point, which is not in the shell, but 2900 miles away from it, as that is the approximate distance between the center sun, and the inner surface of the earth. As a matter of fact it is the equal distribution of the force of gravity all through the shell that keeps the sun suspended in the spot, which is equidistant with every part of the shell. When we are on the outside of the shell it is the mass of the shell that attracts us to its surface. When we go over to the inside of the same shell the same force will still keep our feet solidly planted on the inner side.” Marshall B. Gardner, The Hollow Earth Insider (1913.) (Page 33.)
William Reed also published his book, The Phantom of the Poles in 1913. Nether neither he nor Gardner knew of the others research, but both reached the same conclusions. Reed wrote:
“If the center of the walls of the earth is the center of gravity, then the greatest attraction would be the poles, where it is to be found. Nanson’s [a famous Arctic explorer] description of the dead water, it will be remembered is” ‘We could hardly get on al all, It is a peculiar phenomenon – this dead water – it occurs where a surface layer of fresh water rests upon the salt water of the sea, and this fresh water is carried along with the ship, grinding on the heavier sea water beneath as if on a fixed foundation.” (Pages 269-270.)
Reed Explains:
“The dead water was at a point where the center of gravity was extremely strong; the salt water, being heavier than the fresh, was drawn to the earth with such force that the fresh water could not penetrate it, and laud as separate and distinct upon it as cream upon a pan of milk. In the absence of any further proof of evidence, this dead water must have been about halfway around the curve, entering the interior of the earth and, if so, was in perfect accordance with the laws of the universe – that, the center of gravity is strongest at this point,”
(Page 270.)
Here’s the Pole – There’s the Pole – Where’s the Pole?
If the world were solid as we are told then it stands to reason that the magnetic poles would be at the geographical poles. But the world is not solid and science must be fitted to support the facts. If it’s true that the earth is hollow with large circular openings at the poles then the real location of the geographical poles are not on land, but in the exact center of the North and South polar openings. And if the mass were the attraction of gravity as Gardner claims then the magnetic “pole” would be found to circle around the lips of these openings to the inner lands.
Master Minds of Modern Science (1931) by T.C. Bridges and H. Hessell Tiltman contains short biographies of some of the most intelligent people alive during the early 20th Century including a chapter on Sir Edgeworth David, the first scientist explorer to “visit” the South Magnetic Pole. The article covers Sir Edgewood’s findings.
“The magnetic Poles are not fixed points, but a knowledge of the exact position of this point of magnetic attraction, revised from time to time is necessary to enable sea captains, whose compasses are controlled by its influence within the Southern Hemisphere, to discover their position with greater precision than would otherwise be possible.
Our earliest knowledge of the point of attraction within the Southern Hemisphere depended on observations made in 1814 by Sir James Clarke Ross, the famous Antarctic explorer after whom the Ross Sea is named. Between that date and 1902, when Captain Scott made renewed observations at a distance while on his first expedition, the South Magnetic Pole had moved two hundred miles eastward.
“Though scientists have discovered how to measure the position of any part of the Southern Hemisphere in relation to the center of magnetic attraction, very little is known about the Magnetic Poles or the forces which govern them. To quote one authority:
“The Magnetic Poles are not fixed spots, but are constantly travelling onwards, executing an unknown path and apparently completing a circle in a period of many hundreds of years. In addition to this onward movement of a few miles a year, there is lesser daily oscillation.””
Link
marcuzzzo ha scritto:
ma come cavolo fà una civiltà a vivere all'interno del centro della terra me lo spiegate?? tralasciando l'enorme pressione esercitata dalla crosta,dal mantello e da altre strutture..voi pensate che all'interno del nostro pianeta avvengano quelle reazioni chimiche per attivare il processo nucleare di una stella???
Hollow Earth? Can The Earth Be Hollow?
Why wouldn't it be? Think about its round shape. It was centrifugal force that sculpted the Earth, and all the planets. That force was greater at the equators, so they all bulge at the equators. Going towards the poles, that force would have progressively diminished, such that the outline of the planets would have gradually inclined inwards until, at the poles, there would have been no curvature. The crust at the poles would be very thin because the centrifugal force at the poles would have been very little; the matter there would have slid down and concentrated itself at equator and reinforced the crust there.
As the outer crust cooled, any pent up force within the planet would have most likely expressed itself by blowing out through the axial (polar) points and would have formed openings. ( Our planet has polar openings ) This seems to be what is indicated by the huge, crater-like depressions at the tops of the planets which we can observe. The outer rim or collar of such openings could be a tell-tale sign of such an outburst from the interior which happened long, long ago during the formative stages.
What hollow earth proponents are saying is that the same force which sculpted the outer shape of the planets, that centrifugal force, would have had to have opened up a cavity within the planets, too. The force could not have had such a dramatic impact on the exterior shape and curve of the planets, with no cavity opening up at the core. Because the centrigfugal force was not evenly distributed, the interior cavity would have the shape of a football or rugby ball, with the points edging towards the poles.
The cavity of our Earth can't have a liquid interior. If it had, the tidal force exerted by the Moon would have induced the liquid interior to bust through any crust just as soon as such crust could have formed by
cooling.
And it can't be full of molten lava because the Earth has a magnetic field. The magnetic fields touch the poles and the Earth serves as a conductor to close the circuit. If the inner core of the Earth had the temperatures which the Molten Core Theory stipulates that it does, then any magnetic properties would be lost as heat destroys magnetism. And it doesn't take too much heat- this point is called the Curie Point. So the existence of the Earth's magnetic field indicates that the core is not molten nor hot.
Messaggio orinale: https://old.luogocomune.net/site/newbb/viewtopic.php?forum=6&topic_id=2596