Re: Cosa dovrebbe essere successo al posto del crollo totale? (traduzione)

Inviato da  Cleaner il 30/1/2009 0:19:51

Aggiornamento

WTC 1 - the Case for Collapse/Crush down Arrest and clear Thinking - Debunking the
Conspiracy Theories of Prof. Bazant and NIST

Anders Björkman (M.Sc), updated 27 January 2009

Pubblicata anche controanalisi della favola del NIST su WTC7
WTC 7 - the Case for no Collapse - Debunking the WTC7 Conspiracy Theory of NIST

Anders Björkman (M.Sc), 27 December 2008

piccolo estratto:
"Re the software used to conclude the above NIST refers to two softwares:
LS-DYNA and ANSYS, and makes two models (one only of the bottom 16 floors, the latter of the complete structure)
and copy/paste results (failures!) from the first (locally damaged) model floors 0-16 to the other.
The softwares used are just simple design softwares that can only do static analysis and cannot do structural damage analysis
as suggested in the report with loose parts flying around and alleged debris re-loading the structure continuously."

"NIST might have tried to do just that, e.g. divided the structural 'collapse' into say 6500 of 1/1000 seconds intervals
and run 6500 static models, each one representing the status of the structure during the alleged 6.5 seconds collapse with failed parts,
modified load patterns, modified structure, etc, and uploaded and included it in the new model at every stage,
but there is no indication that they did it. There are too much manual manipulations involved unless you have a clever software to do it ...
which as far as this writer is informed NIST does not have as it does not exist!"

Buona lettura

Saluti