Heisenberg ha scritto:
I risultati delle analisi pubblicati nel report sono incompleti:
"The DNA research on the specimen is in it's very early stages and incomplete [...]. - Dr. Greer"
http://siriusdisclosure.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Chile-Specimen_GPN-Summary.pdf
Ergo, l'affermazione di Sertes di cui sopra è falsa.
The DNA research on the specimen is in it's very early stages and incomplete. Much research remains. There is a paradox between initial DNA tests, which are largely computerized data bases, and the clinical findings in X Rays and CAT scans, and Dr. Lachman's conclusion that the specimen
is 6 years of age and only 6 inches in length. To date, the DNA data cannot explain these perplexing findings. While human-like, it continues to represent an undefined specimen and a least a year of further genetic analysis will be needed by DNA experts. The un-matched DNA (approximately 2 million base pairs of DNA that are un-matched) will need to be carefully explored, and to date this has not been accomplished.
-Dr. Greer
Messaggio orinale: https://old.luogocomune.net/site/newbb/viewtopic.php?forum=51&topic_id=7856&post_id=282228