Critica orgonomica alla teoria delle scie chimiche
Inviato da Aeternum il 29/6/2011 21:30:03
Salve a tutti ho trovato questo sito dedicato alla ricerca sull'orgone dove si muovono dure critiche alla teorie delle scie chimiche:
http://www.orgonelab.org/chemtrails.htm
Particolarmente rilevante è questo brano tratto dal saggio di Wilhelm Reich Contatto con lo spazio:
"DOR absorbed the moisture from the clouds; the clouds, after having become fuzzy and thin, dissipated and fell apart. On the other hand, where there was no DOR in strong concentration, where the sky was bright and blue, clouds formed and held easily. They grew by merger or apposition of newly formed clouds. Now, the same behavior could be seen with regard to the jet vapor trails. The vapor emanating from the jets would hold together for a long time and over miles of sky when the sky was bright and blue, when DOR was absent. On the other hand, the vapor trails would be thin or would not be visible at all, they would not last long, would dissipate quickly when DOR was heavy. In very heavy DOR regions, the vapor trails would not form at all; they would reappear exactly where blue bright sky would surround heavy DOR clouds. ... From then onward one was able at will, at any altitude, in any region of the globe, at any time of the day to determine whether DOR was present in the sky or not; one could even judge the intensity of DOR clouds by the degree in which the vapor trails would fail to form or hold, by their thinness, length, etc. ...It was always with a great joy as well as gratification to see those jet trails reach from horizon to horizon when good DOR removal work had been done."
-- Wilhelm Reich, Contact With Space, 1957, p.89-91
In pratica in questo testo si dice espressamente che è possibile che le scie degli aerei possano permanere per svariate ore quale segno dell'assenza di dor (deadly orgone) nell'atmosfera. Viceversa se scompaiono dopo pochi secondi c'è segno di una forte concentrazione di orgone mortale.
Se fosse così tenuto conto che le nuvole si formano più facilmente in un cielo in cui è assente il dor e tenuto conto che per un chembuster non c'è differenza tra contrail chemtrail o semplice nuvola (le scioglie tutte) possiamo affermare che i chembuster favoriscono la siccità e che le scie che vedete per ore sospese in aria in realtà non siano chemtrails ma semplici contrail che sono rimaste lì grazie all'alta concetrazione di Or.
Che ne pensate?
http://www.orgonelab.org/chemtrails.htm
Particolarmente rilevante è questo brano tratto dal saggio di Wilhelm Reich Contatto con lo spazio:
"DOR absorbed the moisture from the clouds; the clouds, after having become fuzzy and thin, dissipated and fell apart. On the other hand, where there was no DOR in strong concentration, where the sky was bright and blue, clouds formed and held easily. They grew by merger or apposition of newly formed clouds. Now, the same behavior could be seen with regard to the jet vapor trails. The vapor emanating from the jets would hold together for a long time and over miles of sky when the sky was bright and blue, when DOR was absent. On the other hand, the vapor trails would be thin or would not be visible at all, they would not last long, would dissipate quickly when DOR was heavy. In very heavy DOR regions, the vapor trails would not form at all; they would reappear exactly where blue bright sky would surround heavy DOR clouds. ... From then onward one was able at will, at any altitude, in any region of the globe, at any time of the day to determine whether DOR was present in the sky or not; one could even judge the intensity of DOR clouds by the degree in which the vapor trails would fail to form or hold, by their thinness, length, etc. ...It was always with a great joy as well as gratification to see those jet trails reach from horizon to horizon when good DOR removal work had been done."
-- Wilhelm Reich, Contact With Space, 1957, p.89-91
In pratica in questo testo si dice espressamente che è possibile che le scie degli aerei possano permanere per svariate ore quale segno dell'assenza di dor (deadly orgone) nell'atmosfera. Viceversa se scompaiono dopo pochi secondi c'è segno di una forte concentrazione di orgone mortale.
Se fosse così tenuto conto che le nuvole si formano più facilmente in un cielo in cui è assente il dor e tenuto conto che per un chembuster non c'è differenza tra contrail chemtrail o semplice nuvola (le scioglie tutte) possiamo affermare che i chembuster favoriscono la siccità e che le scie che vedete per ore sospese in aria in realtà non siano chemtrails ma semplici contrail che sono rimaste lì grazie all'alta concetrazione di Or.
Che ne pensate?
Messaggio orinale: https://old.luogocomune.net/site/newbb/viewtopic.php?forum=61&topic_id=2976&post_id=197417