Informazioni sul sito
Se vuoi aiutare LUOGOCOMUNE

HOMEPAGE
INFORMAZIONI
SUL SITO
MAPPA DEL SITO

SITE INFO

SEZIONE
11 Settembre
Questo sito utilizza cookies. Continuando la navigazione acconsenti al loro impiego.
 American Moon

Il nuovo documentario
di Massimo Mazzucco
 Login
Nome utente:

Password:


Hai perso la password?

Registrati ora!
 Menu laterale
 

Torna al menù principale

INTRODUZIONE

FAQ - Le domande
più frequenti


Introduzione all' 11 settembre


I "neocons"


10 settembre: qualcuno sapeva


I precedenti storici


Patrioti per l'11 settembre

 
 Una questione di metodo

 
Un punto di partenza

1 - LA VERSIONE UFFICIALE

Colpevoli e mandanti


I 19 assi del cielo


  Le prove sospette


 Le identità al condizionale




La vera storia di Al-Queda

 
Chi  è Osama bin Laden?


La prova del nove


Sintesi capitolo 1

2 - GLI AEREI DIROTTATI

La difesa inesistente


Chi ha cambiato le procedure?


Cronologia comparata dei 4 voli


 War games
(in preparazione)

 
5 cronologie in 5 anni

 
 Il fallimento della difesa


LA PROVA DEL NOVE:

Un piano inesistente


Sintesi capitolo 2

 
3 - Il SEGRETO del PENTAGONO

Il doppio problema del Pentagono


Dove è finito l'aereo?


  I testimoni oculari


Il black-out di Grande Fratello

 
I falsi video del Pentagono


La tesi della disintegrazione


La tesi della penetrazione

 
Simulazione di reato


Operazione "Aquila Nobile"


LA PROVA DEL NOVE:

Il segreto del Pentagono


Hani Hanjour,
dilettante miracolato


Sintesi capitolo 3

4 - IL MISTERO DI UNITED 93

Un altro Boeing scomparso


I fatti riscontrati

DA QUI IN POI IL LAVORO E' ANCORA DA COMPLETARE

Le telefonate dal cielo
 
 
Lo schianto misterioso


  Abbattuto in volo?


  Il Jet bianco


LA PROVA DEL NOVE:
Una complicazione inutile


Sintesi capitolo 4
 
5 - Il WORLD TRADE CENTER

Le Torri che non dovevano crollare


Larry Silverstein,
l'uomo delle Torri



Il World Trade Center Plaza

 
5 anni di teorie contraddittorie

 
Le Torri gemelle

 
Un lampo sul muso del Boeing

 
Il mistero del pod 


La prova del nove

 
 Rapporto NIST: simulazione di collasso


Una potenza misteriosa
   
 
Le pozze di metallo incandescente

 
Acciaio: la cancellazione delle prove


Le demolizioni controllate


World trade center 7:
il più strano di tutti


Smoking Gun?


I pompieri raccontano


Crolli o demolizioni?


Sotto gli occhi di tutti

 
20 domande sulle Torrri Gemelle

 
Confutazione della versione
ufficiale del collasso


  Analisi del trasferimento
della quantità di moto

 
La distruzione del WTC: perché la versione ufficiale non può essere vera

 
Dieci teorie diverse a confronto


Rapporto 911 - Omissioni e distorsioni


115 menzogne sugli attentati
dell'11 settembre


Sintesi capitolo 5
 
6 - I  FAMILIARI DELLE VITTIME

Un popolo a parte


100 domande senza risposta


Sintesi capitolo 6

CONCLUSIONE

Un quadro di insieme


11 settembre

Il punto della situazione

Appendice 1:
STAMPA E TV

 
2006: Un'estate sorprendente


"OGGI"


Le Monde Diplomatique
 
 
 Il caso Diario / Popular Mechanics

PAGINE DI SERVIZIO

LE FONTI

Torna alla homepage di luogocomune

 Menu principale
 Cerca nel sito

Ricerca avanzata

TUTTI I DVD DI LUOGOCOMUNE IN OFFERTA SPECIALE



Questa sezione è stata visitata: 5061457 volte


C'è una domanda che viene naturale da porsi per chiunque, nel momento in cui si pensi realisticamente ad un complotto a livello governativo come quello sospettato dalle teorie alternative: "Con le centinaia, se non migliaia, di persone che debbono per forza essere state coinvolte, come è possibile che nessuno parli, e che tutti mantengano il segreto per sempre, senza nessuna eccezione?"

Prima di tutto, bisogna vedere se davvero servano "centinaia" di persone per portare a termine un'operazione del genere - ne bastano sicuramente molto meno, collocate al posto giusto - ma qualunque fosse il numero, tutti costoro non parlerebbero comunque, visto che sono gli stessi che hanno voluto prendere parte a quell'operazione. (Come si può pensare che una banda di ladri, qualunque sia il suo numero, taccia per sempre dopo aver effettuato il colpo? Perchè è interesse di ciascuno farlo). E se mai a qualcuno venisse il rimorso, vi sono degli ottimi "incentivi" per farglielo passare immediatamente.

Quelli pericolosi sono piuttosto quelli che non ne sapevano nulla - i cosiddetti "buoni" - e vengono per caso ad imbattersi in qualche dettaglio che gli fa capire cosa davvero è successo. Possiamo fare l'esempio di un qualunque pompiere del Pentagono, che avrebbe visto chiaramente se il Boieng c'era oppure no, fino all'agente dell'FBI che scopre qualcosa che non doveva scoprire.

A questo punto però, prima di domandarsi "perchè non parlano?", bisognerebbe essere sicuri che noi saremmo in grado di sentirli, se lo facessero. Basta davvero che un pompiere vada alla CNN per raccontare quello che ha visto sul prato del Pentagono, perchè la sua intervista venga subito diffusa in diretta mondiale?

In realtà, di persone che hanno parlato ce ne sono eccome - e sono tutte  persone di una certa importanza: ministri americani ed esteri, generali, analisti della CIA, politici, persino un ex-direttore dell'FBI, ecc. - ma per qualche motivo noi non siamo mai riusciti a sentirli.

Chi controlla i media oggi controlla il mondo, e se non ci fosse Internet noi non sapremme nemmeno che un problema 11 settembre esiste.
 
In questa pagina presentiamo oltre cinquanta di questi esempi, raccolti dal sito PATRIOTS QUESTION 9/11. Completeremo appena possibile la traduzione per tutti i personaggi.



FEDERAL AND STATE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS

UFFICIALI GOVERNATIVI FEDERALI E STATALI
Congressman Curt Weldon, "What's the Sept. 11 commission got to hide?"

Rep. Curt Weldon –Vice Chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, Vice Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee.  Ten-term Republican Congressman from Pennsylvania. 

  • Article 8/28/05: Regarding the 9/11 Commission "There's something very sinister going on here that really troubles me," Weldon told FOX News on Thursday, blasting the Sept. 11 commission for not taking the claims more seriously. He said some panel members were trying to smear Shaffer and Able Danger.  "What's the Sept. 11 commission got to hide?" Weldon asked.” http://www.foxnews.com/...
  • Press conference transcript 9/17/05: Regarding the 9/11 Commission Report  “There's something wrong here, something tragically wrong.  The American people, the families, the country and the Congress need to know the truth, the whole truth, the complete truth. And so far we haven't gotten it. … Somebody's got to connect the dots and answer the questions. If the 9/11 Commission won't do it, then Congress has to do it." http://www.globalresearch.ca/...
  • Bio: http://curtweldon.house.gov/Biography/
  • Email: CurtPa07@Mail.House.Gov
Curt Weldon (Deputato) - Vicepresidente del Comitato Interno per la Homeland Security, Vicepresidente del Comitato Interno per l'Esercito. Dieci volte eletto Parlamentare repubblicano per la Pennsylvania.

Articolo del 28/08/05. A proposito della Commissione 11/9: "Qui sta succedendo qualcosa di veramente sinistro che mi preoccupa molto" ha dichiarato Weldon a FoxNews, giovedì, biasimando la Commissione 11/9 per non aver preso i richiami in più seria considerazione. Aggiunse che alcuni membri della Commissione stavano tentando di screditare Shaffer e Able Danger. "Cos'ha da nascondere la Commissione 11/9?" chiese Weldon. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,167130,00.html

Trascritto di Conferenza Stampa del 17/09/05. A proposito del Rapporto della Commissione 11/9: "Qui c'è qualcosa di sbagliato, qualcosa di tragicamente sbagliato. Gli americani, le famiglie, la Nazione e il Parlamento hanno bisogno di conoscere la verità, tutta la verità, la completa verità. E sino ad ora non l'abbiamo ottenuta... Qualcuno dovrebbe unire i puntini e rispondere alle domande. Se la Commissione 11/9 non lo farà, allora deve farlo il Parlamento." http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20050917&articleId=965

Biografia: http://curtweldon.house.gov/Biography/

Email: CurtPa07@Mail.House.Gov


Senator Max Cleland – Former member of the 9/11 Commission, resigned in December 2003.  Currently serves on the board of directors of the Export-Import Bank of the United States.  U.S. Senator from Georgia 1996-2002.  Secretary of State of Georgia 1982-1996.  Administrator of the U.S. Veterans Administration 1977-1981.  Captain, U.S. Army awarded Silver Star and Bronze Star for bravery in Viet Nam.  Triple amputee from war injuries. 

  • Article 11/03: Regarding the 9/11 Commission “It is a national scandal.” http://dir.salon.com/story/news/feature/...
  • Article 11/03: "If this decision stands [to limit access to White House documents], I, as a member of the commission, cannot look any American in the eye, especially family members of victims, and say the commission had full access. This investigation is now compromised." http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/...
  • Resigned from the 9/11 Commission, 12/03
  • Transcript of audio interview 3/23/04: “One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up.”   http://www.democracynow.org/...
Senatore Max Cleland - Ex membro della Commissione 11/9, ritirato nel dicembre 2003. Attualmente siede nel consiglio direttivo della Export-Import Bank degli Stati Uniti. Senatore della Georgia dal 1996 al 2002. Segretario di Stato della Georgia dal 1982 al 1996. Responsabile della U.S. Veteran Administration dal 1977 al 1981. Capitano dell'esercito, decorato con Stella d'Argento e Stella di Bronzo per atti di coraggio in Vietnam. Tripla amputazione per ferite di guerra.

Articolo del novembre 2003. A proposito della Commissione 11/9: "E' uno scandalo nazionale". http://dir.salon.com/story/news/feature/2003/11/21/cleland/index.html?pn=1

Articolo del novembre 2003. "Se tale decisione dovesse permanere [di limitare l'accesso ai documenti della Casa Bianca] io, come membro della Commissione 11/9, non potrei guardare negli occhi nessun americano, specialmente i famigliari delle vittime, e dir loro che la Commissione ha libero accesso. Questa investigazione è ora compromessa." link 

Dimessosi dalla Commissione 11/9 nel dicembre 2003

Trascrizione da intervista audio del 23/03/04: "Uno di questi giorni dovremo ottenere tutta la verità, perchè l'11/9 è davvero troppo importante per l'America. Ma questo è proprio ciò che la Casa Bianca vuole impedire." http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/03/23/1546256



Louis Freeh – Director of the FBI, 1993-2001.  Former U.S. District Court Judge for the Southern District of New York, appointed by President George H.W. Bush.  Former Deputy United States Attorney in New York.  Former officer in the United States Army JAG Corps Reserve.

  • Essay: "Even the most junior investigator would immediately know that the name and photo ID of Atta in 2000 is precisely the kind of tactical intelligence the FBI has many times employed to prevent attacks and arrest terrorists. Yet the 9/11 Commission inexplicably concluded that it "was not historically significant." This astounding conclusion--in combination with the failure to investigate Able Danger and incorporate it into its findings--raises serious challenges to the commission's credibility and, if the facts prove out, might just render the commission historically insignificant itself. … No wonder the 9/11 families were outraged by these revelations and called for a "new" commission to investigate.” http://www.opinionjournal.com/...
  • Bio: http://www.consumerwebwatch.org/...
Louis Freeh - Direttore dell'FBI dal 1993 al 2001. Ex Giudice della Corte Distrettuale del Distretto Sud di New York, nominato dal Presidente George W. Bush. Ex Procuratore degli Stati Uniti a New York. Ex Ufficiale dell'Avvocatura Militare (JAG).

Da pubblicazione: "Anche l'investigatore più inesperto saprebbe subito riconoscere che i documenti identificativi, nome e fotografie, di Atta nell'anno 2000 sono esattamente il tipo di informazioni tattiche che l'FBI ha spesso utilizzato per prevenire attacchi e arrestare terroristi. Nonostante ciò la Commissione 11/9 ha inspiegabilmente concluso che "non erano storicamente significativi". Questa conclusione sbalorditiva, in combinazione con la mancata investigazione del caso Able Danger ed inclusione nel monte delle prove raccolte, solleva forti dubbi sulla credibilità della Commissione e, se i fatti lo proveranno, potrebbe rendere la Commissione stessa storicamente irrilevante. Nessuna sorpresa che le famiglie dell'11/9 si siano sentite oltraggiate da queste notizie e abbiano chiesto che ad investigare sia una "nuova" Commissione". http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110007559

Biografia: 



Morgan Reynolds, "We can prove the government's story is false."

Morgan Reynolds, PhD – Chief Economist, U.S. Department of Labor under George W. Bush 2001-2002.  Former Director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis.  Professor Emeritus, Economics, Texas A&M University.

  • Video: “I first began to suspect that 9/11 was in inside job when the Bush-Cheney Administration invaded Iraq. … We can prove that the government’s story is false.”  http://video.google.com/videoplay?...
  • Essay: "It is hard to exaggerate the importance of a scientific debate over the cause(s) of the collapse of the twin towers and building 7. If the official wisdom on the collapses is wrong, as I believe it is, then policy based on such erroneous engineering analysis is not likely [to] prove to be sound."  http://www.lewrockwell.com/...
  • Bio: http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=bio
  • Email: econrn@cox-internet.com
Morgan Reynold, Dottorato - Capo economista del Dipartimento del Lavoro sotto George Bush dal 2001 al 2002. Ex Direttore del Centro di Giustizia Criminale al Centro Nazionale d'Analisi Politica. Professore Emerito di Economia alla Texas A&M University.

Da video. "Ho cominciato a sospettare per la prima volta che l'11/9 fosse un'operazione interna quando l'amministrazione Bush-Cheney invase l'Iraq... Possiamo dimostrare che la scusa del Governo è falsa". http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8180123292618944278

Da pubblicazione: "E' dura esagerare l'importanza di un dibattito scientifico sulle cause del collasso delle torri e dell'edificio n°7. Se il giudizio ufficiale sul collasso è sbagliato, come credo che sia, allora le politiche basate su tale erronea analisi ingegneristica non sono verosimilmente credibili." http://www.lewrockwell.com/reynolds/reynolds12.html

Biografia: http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=bio

Email: econrn@cox-internet.com



Paul Craig Roberts, father of "Reaganomics" questions 9/11 Commission ReportPaul Craig Roberts, PhD - Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Treasury under Ronald Reagan, “Father of Reaganomics”, Former Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal. Currently Research Fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University.

  • Essay:  “We know that it is strictly impossible for any building, much less steel columned buildings, to “pancake” at free fall speed. Therefore, it is a non-controversial fact that the official explanation of the collapse of the WTC buildings is false.”   http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/...
  • Essay: “There are not many editors eager for writers to explore the glaring defects of the 9/11 Commission Report. One would think that if the report could stand analysis, there would not be a taboo against calling attention to the inadequacy of its explanations.” http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts02062006....
  • Bio: http://www.vdare.com/roberts/bio.htm
  • Email: paulcraigroberts@yahoo.com
Paul Craig Roberts, Dottorato - Assistente Consigliere del Tesoro durante il mandato di Ronald Reagan, "Padre dei Reaganomics", ex Editore Associato del Wall Street Journal. Attualmente ricercatore alla Hoover Institution, Stanford University.

Da pubblicazione: "Sappiamo che è impossibile per un qualunque edificio, e ancor meno per edifici con struttura in acciaio, collassare per "effetto pancake" alla velocità di caduta libera. Perciò, è un fatto incontrovertibile che la spiegazione ufficiale del crollo degli edifici del WTC sia falsa". http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article14566.htm

Da pubblicazione: "Non vi sono molti editori impazienti di avere scrittori che indaghino i difetti evidenti del Rapporto della commissione 11/9. Uno penserebbe che se il Rapporto potesse resistere ogni analisi, non ci sarebbe alcun tabù sul fatto di richiamare l'attenzione sull'inadeguatezza delle sue argomentazioni." http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts02062006.html

Biografia: http://www.vdare.com/roberts/bio.htm

Email: paulcraigroberts@yahoo.com



Catherine Austin Fitts, "The Commission was a whitewash."

Catherine Austin Fitts - Assistant Secretary of Housing under George H.W. Bush. Former Managing Director and Member of the Board of Directors of the Wall Street investment bank, Dillon, Read & Co.

  • Audio Interview: Regarding 9/11 “The official story could not possibly have happened. … It’s not possible.  It’s not operationally feasible. … The Commission was a whitewash.” (Radio KPFA 9/9/04 About 45 minutes into the file.) http://157.22.130.4/...
  • Essay: “The first category of people who benefited were those who are guilty and complicit in designing, implementing and financing the 9-11 operation. On such a sophisticated and successful covert operation, the people responsible would have had budgets and financing and would have organized the operation to maximize their political and financial benefits.”   http://globalresearch.ca/... 
  • Signatory: Petition requesting an immediate reinvestigation of 9/11   http://www.911truth.org/article ...
  • Bio: http://www.solari.com/about/ca_fitts.html
Catherine Austin Fitts - Assistente Consigliere degli Interni sotto George Bush Sr. Ex Direttore e membro del Cosiglio Direttivo della Wall Street Investment Bank, Dillon e Read & Co.

Da intervista audio. A proposito dell'11/9: "La Versione Ufficiale non può essere accaduta davvero... Non è possibile. Non è realizzabile da un punto di vista operativo... La Commissione 11/9 è stata un'operazione di cosmesi. (Radio KPFA, 09/09/04, acirca 45 minuti dall'inizio del file) http://157.22.130.4/data/20040909-Thu1700.mp3

Da pubblicazione: "La prima categoria di persone che ne ha beneficiato è stata quella dei complici e colpevoli nella progettazione, implementazione e finanziamento dell'operazione 11/9. In una operazione di copertura così sofisticata e vittoriosa, i responsabili avrebbero disposto di fondi e finanziamenti e avrebbero organizzato la cosa in modo da massimizzare i loro benefici politici e finanziari." http://globalresearch.ca/articles/FIT403A.html

Appelli: petizione in richiesta di una immediata reinvestigazione sull'11/9. http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041026093059633

Biografia: http://www.solari.com/about/ca_fitts.html




Ambassador Edward Peck, We request an immediate re-investigation of 9/11

Edward L. Peck - Deputy Director of the White House Task Force on Terrorism under Ronald Reagan.  Deputy Coordinator, Covert Intelligence Programs at the State Department. U.S. Ambassador and Chief of Mission to Iraq (1977-80).  32-year veteran of the U.S. Foreign Service.

  • Signatory: Petition requesting an immediate reinvestigation of 9/11  
    “We want truthful answers to question. …  As Americans of conscience, we ask for four things:
    • An immediate investigation by New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer
    • Immediate investigation in Congressional Hearings.
    • Media attention to scrutinize and investigate the evidence.
    • The formation of a truly independent citizens-based inquiry." http://www.911truth.org/article. ...
  • Email: peckfsi@erols.com
Edward L. Peck - Direttore della Squadra Speciale Antiterrorismo della Casa Bianca sotto Ronald Reagan. Coordinatore Programmi d'Intelligence sotto Copertura e del Dipartimento di Stato. Ambasciatore e Capo Missione in Iraq dal 1977 al 1980. Veterano di 32 anni nel Servizio Esteri USA.

Appelli: petizione in richiesta di una immediata reinvestigazione sull'11/9. "Vogliamo risposte sincere alle domande... In qualità di americani coscienziosi, chiediamo quattro cose: - Un'immediata investigazione dal Procuratore Generale Eliot Spitzer. - Immediata investigazione nelle udienze Parlamentari. - L'attenzione degli organi d'informazione nell'investigare e ispezionare le prove. La formazione di una indagine veramente indipendente basata sulla rappresentanza dei cittadini. http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041026093059633

Email: peckfsi@erols.com



Morton Goulder, We request an immediate re-investigation of 9/11

Morton Goulder - Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Warning 1973-77 (Nixon, Ford, and Carter)  Founder of Sanders Associates.

  • Signatory: Petition requesting an immediate reinvestigation of 9/11  
    “We want truthful answers to question. …  As Americans of conscience, we ask for four things:
    • An immediate investigation by New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer
    • Immediate investigation in Congressional Hearings.
    • Media attention to scrutinize and investigate the evidence.
    • The formation of a truly independent citizens-based inquiry." http://www.911truth.org/article. ...

  • Morton Goulder - Assistente Consigliere della Difesa per Intelligence e Allarmi dal 1973 al 1977 (sotto Nixon, Ford e Carter). Fondatore della Sanders Associates.

    Appelli: petizione in richiesta di una immediata reinvestigazione sull'11/9. "Vogliamo risposte sincere alle domande... In qualità di americani coscienziosi, chiediamo quattro cose: - Un'immediata investigazione dal Procuratore Generale Eliot Spitzer. - Immediata investigazione nelle udienze Parlamentari. - L'attenzione degli organi d'informazione nell'investigare e ispezionare le prove. La formazione di una indagine veramente indipendente basata sulla rappresentanza dei cittadini. http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041026093059633



Philip Berg, “The official story of what actually took place on 9-11 is a lie.”

Philip J. Berg, Esquire - Former Deputy Attorney General, Pennsylvania.

  • Article: “The official story of what actually took place on 9-11 is a lie.” http://www.americanfreepress.net/...
  • Signatory: Petition requesting an immediate reinvestigation of 9/11  
    “We want truthful answers to question. …  As Americans of conscience, we ask for four things:
    • An immediate investigation by New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer
    • Immediate investigation in Congressional Hearings.
    • Media attention to scrutinize and investigate the evidence.
    • The formation of a truly independent citizens-based inquiry." http://www.911truth.org/article.php?...
  • Bio:  http://www.911forthetruth.com/...
  • Email: philjberg@911forthetruth.com
Philip J. Berg, Emerito - Ex Procuratore Generale, Pennsylvania.

Da articolo: "La Versione Ufficiale di quello che davvero avvenne l'11/9 è una menzogna." http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/trade_towers_rescue.html

Appelli: petizione in richiesta di una immediata reinvestigazione sull'11/9. "Vogliamo risposte sincere alle domande... In qualità di americani coscienziosi, chiediamo quattro cose: - Un'immediata investigazione dal Procuratore Generale Eliot Spitzer. - Immediata investigazione nelle udienze Parlamentari. - L'attenzione degli organi d'informazione nell'investigare e ispezionare le prove. La formazione di una indagine veramente indipendente basata sulla rappresentanza dei cittadini. http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041026093059633

Biografia: http://www.911forthetruth.com/pages/BergBio.htm

Email: philjberg@911forthetruth.com



SENIOR U.S. MILITARY AND INTELLIGENCE SERVICE VETERANS

Superiori
Esperti Militari e di Inteligence
William Christison, “I now think there is persuasive evidence that the events of September did not unfold as the Bush administration and the 9/11 Commission would have us believe. … An airliner almost certainly did not hit The Pentagon. … The North and South Towers of the World Trade Center almost certainly did not collapse and fall to earth because hijacked aircraft hit them.”

William Christison - Former National Intelligence Officer and Director of the CIA's Office of Regional and Political Analysis.  29-year CIA veteran.

  • Essay: “I now think there is persuasive evidence that the events of September did not unfold as the Bush administration and the 9/11 Commission would have us believe. … An airliner almost certainly did not hit The Pentagon. … The North and South Towers of the World Trade Center almost certainly did not collapse and fall to earth because hijacked aircraft hit them.” http://www.dissidentvoice.org...  
  • Article: "David Griffin believes this all was totally an inside job - I've got to say I think that it was too," said Christison. … I have since decided that....at least some elements in this US government had contributed in some way or other to causing 9/11 to happen or at least allowing it to happen. … The reason that the two towers in New York actually collapsed and fell all the way to the ground was controlled explosions rather than just being hit by two airplanes. … All of the characteristics of these demolitions show that they almost had to have been controlled explosions." http://www.prisonplanet.com/...
  • Email: kathy.bill@christison-santafe.com, christison@counterpunch.org

General Albert Stubblebine, "I look at the hole in the Pentagon and I look at the size of an airplane that was supposed to have hit the Pentagon. And I said, ‘The plane does not fit in that hole’. So what did hit the Pentagon? What hit it? Where is it? What's going on?”Major General Albert Stubblebine, U.S. Army (ret) - Commanding General of the U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM).  Former head of Imagery Interpretation for Scientific and Technical Intelligence.

  • Video: ““One of my experiences in the Army was being in charge of the Army’s Imagery Interpretation for Scientific and Technical Intelligence during the Cold War.  I measured pieces of Soviet equipment from photographs. It was my job. I look at the hole in the Pentagon and I look at the size of an airplane that was supposed to have hit the Pentagon. And I said, ‘The plane does not fit in that hole’. So what did hit the Pentagon? What hit it? Where is it? What's going on?” http://www.undersiegemovie.com ...
  • Bio: http://www.canadiansub.com/Board....
Colonel Ronald Ray, "I'm astounded that the conspiracy theory advanced by the administration could in fact be true and the evidence does not seem to suggest that's accurate."

Col. Ronald D. Ray, U.S. Marine Corps (ret) - Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense during the Reagan Administration and a highly decorated Vietnam veteran (two Silver Stars, a Bronze Star and a Purple Heart).  Appointed by President George H.W. Bush to serve on the American Battle Monuments Commission (1990-1994), and on the 1992 Presidential Commission on the Assignment of Women in the Armed Forces. From 1990 through 1994, he served as Military Historian and Deputy Director of Field Operations for the U.S. Marine Corps Historical Center, Washington, D.C.

  • Article: “The former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense under the Reagan Administration and a highly decorated Vietnam veteran and Colonel has gone on the record to voice his doubts about the official story of 9/11 - calling it ‘the dog that doesn't hunt.’  ‘I'm astounded that the conspiracy theory advanced by the administration could in fact be true and the evidence does not seem to suggest that's accurate,’ he said.”  http://www.prisonplanet.com/...  
  • Bio: http://www.firstprinciplespress.org/...
  • Email: ffp@iglou.com
Raymond McGovern, "The 9/11 report is a joke. The question is: What’s being covered up? Is it gross malfeasance, gross negligence, misfeasance?"

Raymond L. McGovern - Former Chairman, National Intelligence Estimates, CIA, responsible for preparing the President’ Daily Brief (PDB) for Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush.  27-year CIA veteran.

  • Video:  “I think at simplest terms, there’s a cover-up.  The 9/11 report is a joke.  The question is: What’s being covered up?  Is it gross malfeasance, gross negligence, misfeasance? … Now there are a whole bunch of unanswered questions.  And the reason they’re unanswered is because this administration will not answer the questions. … I just want to reassert, what Scott [Ritter, former Major in the U.S. Marines Corps, former Chief Weapons Inspector for the United Nations Special Commission in Iraq] said and this is the bottom line for me, just as Hitler in 1933 cynically exploited the burning of the parliament building, the Reichstag, this is exactly what our President did in exploiting 9/11.  The cynical way in which he played on our trauma, used it to justify attacking, making a war of aggression on a country that he knew had nothing to do with 9/11.  That suffices for me, I think Scott is exactly right, that’s certainly an impeachable offense.” http://video.google.com/videoplay?...
  • Signatory: Petition requesting an immediate reinvestigation of 9/11 http://www.911truth.org/...
  • Bio: http://faculty.schreiner.edu/...
  • Email: mcgovern@counterpunch.org
Colonel Robert Bowman, “A lot of these pieces of information, taken together, prove that the official story, the official conspiracy theory of 9/11 is a bunch of hogwash. It’s impossible."

Col. Robert Bowman, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret) - Director of Advanced Space Programs Development “Star Wars Program” under Presidents Ford and Carter.  U.S. Air Force fighter pilot with over 100 combat missions. (PhD in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering, Cal Tech).

  • Video: “A lot of these pieces of information, taken together, prove that the official story, the official conspiracy theory of 9/11 is a bunch of hogwash.  It’s impossible. … There’s a second group of facts having to do with the cover up. … Taken together these things prove that high levels of our government don’t want us to know what happened and who’s responsible. … Who gained from 9/11?  Who covered up crucial information about 9/11?  And who put out the patently false stories about 9/11 in the first place?  When you take those three things together, I think the case is pretty clear that it’s highly placed individuals in the administration with all roads passing through Dick Cheney.  I think the very kindest thing that we can say about George W. Bush and all the people in the U.S. Government that have been involved in this massive cover-up, the very kindest thing we can say is that they were aware of impending attacks and let them happen.  Now some people will say that’s much too kind, however even that is high treason and conspiracy to commit murder.”  http://video.google.com/...
  • Signatory: Petition requesting an immediate reinvestigation of 9/11   http://www.911truth.org/article.php?...
  • Bio: http://bowman2006.com/about....
  • Email: DrBob@Bowman2006.com
George Nelson, "With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon as alleged."

Col. George Nelson, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Former U.S. Air Force aircraft accident investigator and airplane parts authority. 34-year Air Force career.

  • Essay: “The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft. On the contrary, it seems only that all potential evidence was deliberately kept hidden from public view. …

    With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon as alleged. Similarly, with all the evidence available at the Pennsylvania crash site, it was most doubtful that a passenger airliner caused the obvious hole in the ground and certainly not the Boeing 757 as alleged. …

    As painful and heartbreaking as was the loss of innocent lives and the lingering health problems of thousands more, a most troublesome and nightmarish probability remains that so many Americans appear to be involved in the most heinous conspiracy in our country's history.”   http://www.physics911.net/georgenelson....

Capt. Russ Wittenberg, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Air Force fighter pilot with over 100 combat missions.  Flew commercial jets for Pan Am and United Airlines for 35 years, flying 707, 720, 727, 737, 747, 757, 767, and 777 ’s.  He had previously flown the actual two United Airlines airplanes that were hijacked on 9/11 (Flight 93, which impacted in Pennsylvania, and Flight 175, the second plane to hit the WTC).

  • Article:  "The government story they handed us about 9/11 is total B.S. plain and simple.” … Wittenberg convincingly argued there was absolutely no possibility that Flight 77 could have "descended 7,000 feet in two minutes, all the while performing a steep 270 degree banked turn before crashing into the Pentagon's first floor wall without touching the lawn." … 

    "For a guy to just jump into the cockpit and fly like an ace is impossible - there is not one chance in a thousand," said Wittenberg, recalling that when he made the jump from Boeing 727's to the highly sophisticated computerized characteristics of the 737's through 767's it took him considerable time to feel comfortable flying.” http://www.arcticbeacon.com/17-Jul-2005....
  • Audio Interview 9/16/04: Regarding Flight 77, which allegedly hit the Pentagon.  “The airplane could not have flown at those speeds which they said it did without going into what they call a high speed stall.  The airplane won’t go that fast if you start pulling those high G maneuvers at those bank angles. … And so for them to expect this alleged airplane to run these maneuvers with a total amateur at the controls is simply ludicrous. …

    It’s roughly a 100 ton airplane.  And an airplane that weighs 100 tons all assembled is still going to have 100 tons of disassembled trash and parts after it hits a building.  There was no wreckage from a 757 at the Pentagon. … The vehicle that hit the Pentagon was not Flight 77.  We think, as you may have heard before, it was a cruise missile.”  http://911underground.com/.../

Capt. Gregory M. Zeigler, PhD, U.S. Army- Former U.S. Army Intelligence Officer

  • "I knew from September 18, 2001, that the official story about 9/11 was false. ... [A]nomalies poured in rapidly: the hijackers' names appearing in none of the published flight passenger lists, BBC reports of stolen identities of the alleged hijackers or the alleged hijackers being found alive, the obvious demolitions of WTC1, 2, and 7, the lack of identifiable Boeing 757 wreckage at the Pentagon ... Link to full statement
  • Email: gzeigler@cybermesa.com
Melvin Goodman, “I want to talk about the [9/11] Commission itself, about the flawed process of the Commission and finally about the conflict of interest within the Commission that is extremely important to understand the failure of the Commission.”

Melvin Goodman - Division Chief and Senior Analyst at the Office of Soviet Affairs, CIA,1966 to 1990.   Senior Analyst at the Bureau of Intelligence and Research, State Department, 1974 to 1976.

  • Congressional testimony: “I want to talk about the [9/11] Commission itself, about the flawed process of the Commission and finally about the conflict of interest within the Commission that is extremely important to understand the failure of the Commission.”   http://www.house.gov/mckinney/...
  • Signatory: Petition requesting an immediate reinvestigation of 9/11  
    “We want truthful answers to question. …  As Americans of conscience, we ask for four things:
    • An immediate investigation by New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer
    • Immediate investigation in Congressional Hearings.
    • Media attention to scrutinize and investigate the evidence.
    • The formation of a truly independent citizens-based inquiry." http://www.911truth.org/article.php?...
  • Bio: http://ciponline.org/biographies....
Karen Kwiatkowski, “Reading through the official 9/11 report, I quickly lost my focus – apparently emulating the 9/11 commission over the past 20 months."

Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Political-Military Affairs Officer in the Office of the Secretary of Defense. On the staff of the Director of the National Security Agency. 20-year Air Force veteran.

  • Essay: “Reading through the official 9/11 report, I quickly lost my focus – apparently emulating the 9/11 commission over the past 20 months. …One wonders if the entire commission wasn't secretly replaced by pod people from the old Soviet Central Committee.   I naively expected more constructive and useful information in the report.” http://www.lewrockwell.com/...
  • Bio: http://militaryweek.com/...
  • Email: ksusiek@shentel.net
Douglas Rokke, "When you look at the whole thing, especially the crash site void of airplane parts, the size of the hole left in the building and the fact the projectile's impact penetrated numerous concrete walls, it looks like the work of a missile. And when you look at the damage, it was obviously a missile.”

Major Douglas Rokke, PhD, U.S. Army (ret) – Director U.S. Army Depleted Uranium Project.

  • Article: Regarding the impact at the Pentagon on 9/11/2001 "When you look at the whole thing, especially the crash site void of airplane parts, the size of the hole left in the building and the fact the projectile's impact penetrated numerous concrete walls, it looks like the work of a missile.  And when you look at the damage, it was obviously a missile.”   http://www.rense.com/general67/radfdf....
  • Email: Dlind49@aol.com
Scott Ritter

Major Scott Ritter, U.S. Marine Corps (ret) - Marine Corps Intelligence Officer and Chief Weapons Inspector for the United Nations Special Commission in Iraq 1991-1998.

  • Video: “I, like the others, are frustrated by the 9/11 Commission Report, by the lack of transparency on the part of the United States government, both in terms of the executive branch and the legislative branch when it comes to putting out on the table all facts known to the 9/11 case.” http://video.google.com/videoplay?...
  • E-mail: wsritter@aol.com
Fred Burks, “How is it possible that our military's highly touted missile detections systems could not locate Flight 77 in the 42 minutes it was known to be lost before it crashed into the heart of the defense system of the U.S.?"

Fred Burks - State Department Interpreter for Presidents George W. Bush and Bill Clinton, Vice Presidents Dick Cheney and Al Gore, Secretaries of State Colin Powell and Madeleine Albright.  18-year State Department career.

  • Essay:  “How is it possible that our military's highly touted missile detections systems could not locate Flight 77 in the 42 minutes it was known to be lost before it crashed into the heart of the defense system of the U.S.? …

    An even bigger question is why isn't our media asking these questions? Why isn't our military spending many millions of dollars to find out why military defense systems failed on 9/11? Why is it that the 9/11 commission budget was far less than the budget allotted to the Challenger Disaster or even the Monika Lewinsky affair?”  http://www.wanttoknow.info/911star...

  • Signatory: Petition requesting an immediate reinvestigation of 9/11 http://www.911truth.org/...
Barbara Honegger, "A US military plane, not one piloted by al Qaeda, performed the highly skilled, high−speed 270−degree dive towards the Pentagon that Air Traffic Controllers on 9/11 were sure was a military plane as they watched it on their screens. Only a military aircraft, not a civilian plane flown by al Qaeda, would have given off the "Friendly" signal needed to disable the Pentagon’s anti−aircraft missile batteries as it approached the building."

Barbara Honegger - Senior Military Affairs Journalist at the Naval Postgraduate School, the Navy’s advanced science, technology and national security affairs university (1995 - present). White House Policy Analyst and Special Assistant to the Assistant to President Ronald Reagan (1981-83).

  • Essay:  "The US military, not al Qaeda, had the sustained access weeks before 9/11 to also plant controlled demolition charges throughout the superstructures of WTC 1 and WTC2, and in WTC7, which brought down all three buildings on 9/11. ... A US military plane, not one piloted by al Qaeda, performed the highly skilled, high−speed 270−degree dive towards the Pentagon that Air Traffic Controllers on 9/11 were sure was a military plane as they watched it on their screens. Only a military aircraft, not a civilian plane flown by al Qaeda, would have given off the "Friendly" signal needed to disable the Pentagon’s anti−aircraft missile batteries as it approached the building. Only the US military, not al Qaeda, had the ability to break all of its Standard Operating Procedures to paralyze its own emergency response system.”  http://blog.lege.net/...

Sibel Edmonds, “I find your report seriously flawed in its failure to address serious intelligence issues that I am aware of, which have been confirmed, and which as a witness to the commission, I made you aware of."

Sibel Edmonds – Former Language Translation Specialist, FBI. Witness before the 9/11 Commission.

  • Letter to 9/11 Commission: “I find your report seriously flawed in its failure to address serious intelligence issues that I am aware of, which have been confirmed, and which as a witness to the commission, I made you aware of. Thus, I must assume that other serious issues that I am not aware of were in the same manner omitted from your report. These omissions cast doubt on the validity of your report and therefore on its conclusions and recommendations.” http://www.commondreams.org...
  • Email: sedmonds@nswbc.org
Bogdan Dzakovic, "At worst, I think the 9/11 Commission Report is treasonous. And if you look at what the word “treason” means in the Webster’s Dictionary, it’s a betrayal of a trust.”

Bogdan Dzakovic - 14-year Counter-terrorism expert in the Security Division of the Federal Aviation Administration. Team Leader of the FAA's Red Team, which conducted undercover tests on airport security through simulated terrorist attacks.  Former Team Leader in the Federal Air Marshal program.  Former Coast Guard officer.  Witness before the 9/11 Commission.

  • Video transcript: Regarding the 9/11 Commission “The best I could say about it is they really botched the job by not really going into the real failures. … At worst, I think the 9/11 Commission Report is treasonous. And if you look at what the word “treason” means in the Webster’s Dictionary, it’s a betrayal of a trust.”  http://www.911report.com...

Letter to Congress regarding the 9/11 Commission Report, signed by the following 25 military, intelligence, and security veterans:

“[W]e the undersigned wish to bring to the attention of the Congress and the people of the United States what we believe are serious shortcomings in the [9/11 Commission] report and its recommendations.  …

Omission is one of the major flaws in the Commission’s report. We are aware of significant issues and cases that were duly reported to the commission by those of us with direct knowledge, but somehow escaped attention. …

The omission of such serious and applicable issues and information by itself renders the report flawed, and casts doubt on the validity of many of its recommendations.” http://www.pogo.org/m/hsp/...

Edward J. Costello, Jr., Former Special Agent, Counterterrorism, FBI
John M. Cole, Former Veteran Intelligence Operations Specialist, FBI
David "Mark" Conrad, Retired Agent in Charge, Internal Affairs, U.S. Customs
Rosemary N. Dew, Former Supervisory Special Agent, Counterterrorism and Counterintelligence, FBI
Bogdan Dzakovic, Former Red Team Leader, FAA (See also individual quote above.)
Sibel D. Edmonds, Former Language Specialist, FBI (See also individual quote above.)
Steve Elson, Retired Navy Seal and Former Special Agent, FAA and US Navy
David Forbes, Aviation, Logistics and Govt. Security Analysts, BoydForbes, Inc.,
Melvin A. Goodman, Retired Senior Analyst/ Division Manager and Senior Fellow at the Center for International Policy, CIA (See also individual quote above.)
Mark Graf, Former Security Supervisor, Planner, and Derivative Classifier, Department of Energy
Gilbert M. Graham, Retired Special Agent, Counterintelligence, FBI
Diane Kleiman, Former Special Agent, US Customs
Lt Col Karen U. Kwiatkowski, Veteran Policy Analyst, U.S. Air Force-DoD (See also individual quote above.)
Lynne A. Larkin, Former Operation Officer, CIA
David MacMichael, Former Senior Estimates Officer, CIA
Raymond L. McGovern, Veteran Analyst, CIA (See also individual quote above.)
Theodore J. Pahle, Senior Intelligence Officer (Ret), Defense Intelligence Agency, Office of Naval Intelligence, and U.S. Army Intelligence
Behrooz Sarshar, Retired Language Specialist, FBI
Brian F. Sullivan, Retired Special Agent and Risk Management Specialist, FAA
Larry J. Tortorich, Retired US Naval Officer, US Navy and Dept. of Homeland Security/TSA
Jane A. Turner, Retired Special Agent, FBI
John B. Vincent, Retired Special Agent, Counterterrorism, FBI
Dr. Fred Whitehurst, Retired Supervisory Special Agent/Laboratory Forensic Examiner, FBI
Col. Ann Wright, Retired Reserve Colonel and Former US Diplomat, US Army,
Matthew J. Zipoli, Special Response Team (SRT) Officer, DOE


INTERNATIONAL MILITARY AND INTELLIGENCE EXPERTS

ESPERTI INTERNAZIONALI DELL'ESERCITO E DELL'INTELLIGENCE

Paul Hellyer, "I think the inquiry has been very shallow, very superficial. I would like to see a much tougher, more in-depth inquiry."

Paul Hellyer – Former Minister of National Defense of Canada. Former Deputy Prime Minister.  Former Member of House of Commons.

  • Video: Regarding 9/11  “I think the inquiry has been very shallow, very superficial.  I would like to see a much tougher, more in-depth inquiry. … I would like to see someone in a position of authority ask those questions and insist on getting answers, at least to why some of the things that happened that seem to be, for an ordinary person, inexplicable. … We have to try and get the truth. … I hope that somebody has the courage and persistence to keep at it until we get it.” http://www.septembereleventh.org/...
  • Bio: http://www.nationmaster.com/...
  • Email: phellyer@canadianactionparty.ca

Paul Hellyer-Ex Ministro di Difesa Nazionale del Canada. Ex Vice Primo Ministro. Ex Membro di Camera dei Comuni nel Parlamento Canadese. (Canada)

• Video: Riguardo al 11/9 "io penso che l'indagine è stata molto poco profonda, molto superficiale. Gradirei vedere un'indagine molto più robusta, più profonda. … Gradirei vedere qualcuno in una posizione di autorità che faccia quelle domande ed insista su trovare risposte, almeno il perché delle alcune cose che sono successe, sembrano essere, per una persona normale inesplicabile. … Noi dobbiamo tentare e trovare la verità. … Io spero che qualcuno abbia il coraggio e la persistenza, per tenere duro finché noi lo troviamo questa verita." http://www.septembereleventh.org /... Bio: http://www.nationmaster.com /... E-mail: phellyer@canadianactionparty.ca


Andreas von Buelow, “The official story is so inadequate and far-fetched that there must be another one.”Andreas von Buelow, PhD – Former National Minister of Defense of West Germany. Former Minister of Technology.  Former Member of Bundestag (Parliament).

  • Video:  “The official story is so inadequate and far-fetched that there must be another one.”   http://video.google.com/...
  • Article/Interview: “The planning of the attacks was technically and organizationally a master achievement. To hijack four huge airplanes within a few minutes and within one hour, to drive them into their targets, with complicated flight maneuvers!  This is unthinkable, without years-long support from secret apparatuses of the state and industry.”   http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/VonBuelow....

Von di Andreas Buelow-PhD. Ex Ministro Nazionale di Difesa della Germania Ovest. Ex Ministro della Tecnologia. Ex Membro di Bundestag (il Parlamento).(Germania)

• Video: "La storia ufficiale è così inadeguata e forzata che ci deve essere un altro storia." http://video.google.com /...

Articolo: "La pianificazione degli attacchi, era tecnicamente ed organizzativamente un conseguimento eccellente. Dirottare quattro aeroplani enormi entro pochi minuti e nell’arco di un'ora, guidarli nei loro obiettivi, con manovre di volo complicate! Questo è impensabile, senza appoggio che dura per anni da apparati segreti dello stato e dell’industria." http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/VonBuelow....


Michael Meacher, “It was a 580-page avoidance of any serious explanation."Michael Meacher – Former Under Secretary for Industry, Under Secretary for Health and Social Security, Minister for the Environment, and Member of the House of Commons (Parliament) (UK).

  • Video:  Regarding the 9/11 Commission Report  “It was a 580-page avoidance of any serious explanation. … The official investigative report says the US has never been able to find the sources of financing for 9/11.  And then they say this “That after all is a matter of no great importance.”  I find that astonishing.  It is a matter of absolutely central importance. So there was a very great deal of evidence.  And it seems to me extraordinary that the United States with its stupendous military capabilities and the most technologically advanced country in the world completely and totally failed to follow up on these leads.” http://video.google.com/...
  • Bio: http://www.epolitix.com/...
  • Email: C/o Monica Masson, massonm@parliament.uk

Michael Meacher-Ex Sotto Segretario per Industria, Sotto Segretario per la Salute e la sicurezza Sociale, Ministro per l'Ambiente, e Membro della Camera dei Comuni nel Parlamento Inglese. (Regno Unito).

• Video: Riguardo il Rapporto della Commissione sull 11/9 "Il rapporto di 580 pagine è un modo per evitare ogni serio chiarimento. … Il rapporto investigativo ed ufficiale dice gli Stati Uniti non è stato mai in grado trovare le fonti finanziarie del 11/9. E poi loro dicono questo "Che dopo tutto questa è una questione di nessuna grande importanza." Io trovo quello stupefacente. È una questione d'importanza assolutamente centrale. C'era quindi una quantità molto grande dell'evidenza. E quello che a me sembra straordinario è che gli Stati Uniti,che sono non solo il paese con la più grande capacita militare,ma anche il più avanzato tecnologicamente,hanno fallito completamente e totalmente nel seguire questa linea principale." http://video.google.com /...

Bio: http://www.epolitix.com /...

E-mail: C/o Monica Masson, massonm@parliament.uk




Leonid Ivashov, “Only secret services and their current chiefs – or those retired but still having influence inside the state organizations – have the ability to plan, organize and conduct an operation of such magnitude.” General Leonid Ivashov - Former Chief of Staff of the Russian armed forces on 9/11/2001, and Department Chief for General affairs in the Soviet Union's Ministry of Defense.

  • Essay: Regarding 9/11 “Only secret services and their current chiefs – or those retired but still having influence inside the state organizations – have the ability to plan, organize and conduct an operation of such magnitude.”  http://www.physics911.net/ivashov....
Leonid Ivashov Generale- Ex Capo di Stato Maggiore delle Forze Armate Russe 11/9/2001, e Capo Dipartimento degli Affari Generali nel Ministero della Difesa dell'Unione Sovietica. (Russia) Articolo: Riguardo al 11/9 " Solo i servizi segreti ed i loro capi attuali o in congedo – ma che hanno conservato dell’influenza all’interno delle strutture dello stato – sono in grado di pianificare, organizzare e gestire un’operazione di tale ampiezza." http://www.physics911.net/ivashov....
Mohamed Hassanein Heikal, Bin Laden does not have the capabilities for an operation of this magnitude. When I hear Bush talking about al-Qaida as if it was Nazi Germany or the communist party of the Soviet Union, I laugh because I know what is there."

Mohamed Hassanein Heikal – Well-known journalist and writer, Former Minister of Egypt

  • Article: Regarding 9/11 "Bin Laden does not have the capabilities for an operation of this magnitude. When I hear Bush talking about al-Qaida as if it was Nazi Germany or the communist party of the Soviet Union, I laugh because I know what is there. Bin Laden has been under surveillance for years: every telephone call was monitored and al-Qaida has been penetrated by American intelligence, Pakistani intelligence, Saudi intelligence, Egyptian intelligence. They could not have kept secret an operation that required such a degree of organisation and sophistication."  http://www.guardian.co.uk/...


Mohamed Hassanein Heikal - Noto scrittore e giornalista, ex-ministro egiziano. Articolo: Riguardo a 11/9 "Bin Ladeb non ha le capacità per un'operazione di questa ampiezza. Quando io sento Bush che parla di Al-Qaida come se fossero i Nazisti della Germania oppure il Partito Comunista dell'Unione sovietica, io ridò perché io so quello che succede là. Bin Laden è sotto sorveglianza da anni: ogni telefonata fu monitorata ed Al-Qaida è stato penetrato dai servizi secreti americani, pachistani, dell’Arabia Saudita, e quelli egiziani. Loro non potevano tenere segreti un'operazione che ha richiesto tale grado di organisazione e sofisticazione." http://www.guardian.co.uk /...



David Shayler, “The available evidence indicates that people in key positions in the FBI, the State Department, the CIA and so on were not loyal to the Constitution; that they saw an opportunity in plans laid down by genuine Islamic terrorists to carry out an operation that would shock the world and would therefore justify U.S. adventurism in the middle East, particularly in Afghanistan and Iraq.”David Shayler - Counter-Terrorism Officer, MI5 (Britain)

  • Video: “The available evidence indicates that people in key positions in the FBI, the State Department, the CIA and so on were not loyal to the Constitution; that they saw an opportunity in plans laid down by genuine Islamic terrorists to carry out an operation that would shock the world and would therefore justify U.S. adventurism in the middle East, particularly in Afghanistan and Iraq.”  http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5403286136814574974

David Shayler- Ex Ufficiale di Anti Terrorismo, MI5 (Regno Unito) Video: "Le evidenze disponibili indicano che persone in posizioni di chiave nel FBI, nel Dipartimento di Stato,nella CIA e così via non erano fedeli alla Costituzione; che loro videro un'opportunità nei piani formulati da terroristi islamici genuini per eseguire un'operazione che scioccherebbe il mondo e giustificherebbe perciò l'avventurismo Americano nel Medio Oriente, particolarmente in Afghanistan e l'Iraq." http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5403286136814574974



A PERSONAL NOTE ABOUT THIS WEBSITE

I believed the official explanation of 9/11 for four and one-half years. I remember, during that time, becoming angry at news stories about people who challenged that explanation. However, in the Spring of 2006, I saw the documentary, Loose Change, on the Internet. Although not an entirely objective documentary, it raised many serious and disturbing questions about the events of 9/11 that I had previously simply accepted without much critical thought.

And so I began a several month period of researching the events of 9/11. I found a great deal of material challenging the 9/11 Commission Report on web sites like 911truth.org, physics911.net, st911.org and many others. I attended a lecture by David Ray Griffin. I learned much about what has become known as the 9/11 Truth Movement.

Much of the information and most of the rather limited media coverage about the 9/11 Truth Movement focuses on college professors, such as: David Ray Griffin, Steven Jones, James Fetzer, Kee Dewdney, and others. In August of 2006, I began searching for statements about 9/11 by members of the intelligence services, military and government. Because of their experience in these areas, I felt their opinions about 9/11 would be an additional valuable source of information. I was surprised by the amount of criticism of 9/11 from this group that I found scattered around the Internet. I had learned of virtually none of this criticism through newspapers, television, or radio news sources.

I feel this information is very important and that it has been seriously under-reported. This web site is an effort to collect and summarize these public statements and make them easily accessible.

If you are aware of any similar statements made by senior members of the intelligence services, military or government, I would greatly appreciate knowing about them. Please email me at alan.miller@PatriotsQuestion911.com. Additionally, if you find any errors in this material, please let me know.

I don't claim to know what really happened on 9/11.  I cannot examine the facts of the matter first hand.  And I don't have the experience to know what's possible and what is unlikely regarding terrorist activities or military operations.  For that analysis, I need to rely on experts. I greatly value these individuals' statements because most of them have spent large portions of their careers studying espionage, terrorism, and military operations throughout the world and personally planned and carried out United States' military and intelligence activities.  In other words, they're experienced professionals, whom I trust.

My objective, at this point, is to have our government launch a new, extremely thorough and impartial re-examination of the terrible acts of 9/11 and the events leading up to them. In my opinion, and in the opinion of the above listed experienced individuals, the current 9/11 Commission Report is seriously inadequate in explaining what really happened.

I also want to acknowledge that none of the information on this web site is the result of any original investigation on my part. I have merely researched and compiled public information available on the Internet. I want to thank those in the 9/11 Truth Movement for their efforts over the last five years for conducting a great deal of research and for keeping the Movement alive in the face of both ridicule and indifference.

For the sake of those who died on 9/11, their families, the American people, and for the sake of peace in the world, please continue to seek the truth about 9/11.

Sincerely,

Alan Miller
September 2006
Email: alan.miller@PatriotsQuestion911.com


UNA NOTA PERSONALE SU QUESTO SITO WEB
(scritta dal responsabile del sito originale)

Ho creduto alla spiegazione ufficiale del 11/9 per quattro anni e mezzo. Ricordo, durante quel periodo, di infuriarmi davanti alle notizie di persone che mettevano in discussione quella spiegazione che ci era stata data. Tuttavia, nella primavera del 2006, ho visto il documentario Loose Change, su Internet. Sebbene non fosse un documentario completamente obiettivo, ha sollevato molti dubbi seri e preoccupanti riguardo agli eventi dell'11/9, che in precedenza avevo semplicemente accettato senza molto pensiero critico.

E così ho cominciato un lungo periodo di ricerca sugli eventi dell'11/9. Ho trovato una gran quantità di materiale che metteva in discussione il Rapporto della Commissione sul 9/11 in siti web come 911truth.org, physics911.net, st911.org e molti altri. Ho assistito ad una conferenza di David Ray Griffin. Ho imparato molto da quel che poi è diventato noto come il Movimento per la Verità sull'11/9.

Molte delle informazioni e della maggior parte della copertura mediatica assai limitata riguardo al Movimento per la Verità sull'11/9, è concentrata sui professori universitari, come: David Ray Griffin, Steven Jones, James Fetzer, Kee Dewdney, e altri. Nell'agosto del 2006, ho cominciato a cercare le dichiarazioni sull'11/9 da parte dei membri dei servizi d'intelligence, militari e di governo. Data la loro esperienza in questi settori, sentivo che le loro considerazioni sull'11/9 sarebbero state una preziosa fonte aggiuntiva di informazioni. Sono rimasto colpito dall'ammontare di critiche riguardo all'11/9 da parte di questo gruppo che ho trovato sparso intorno alla rete. Non avevo riscontrato praticamente nessuna di queste critiche nelle fonti giornalistiche, televisive, o radiofoniche.

Sento che queste informazioni sono molto importanti e che sono state gravemente comunicate insufficientemente. Questo sito web raccoglie gli sforzi nel cercare di raccogliere e riassumere queste dichiarazioni pubbliche e renderle facilmente accessibili.

Se siete a conoscenza di qualsiasi dichiarazione simile fatta da membri superiori dei servizi di intelligence, militari o governativi, vi sarei molto grato di poterne sapere più su di loro. Per favore contattatemi all'indirizzo email alan.miller@PatriotsQuestion911.com. Inoltre, se trovaste qualsiasi errore in questo materiale, per favore fatemelo sapere.

Non pretendo di sapere cosa sia realmente successo l'11/9. Non posso esaminare la realtà diretta dei fatti. E non ho l'esperienza necessaria per comprendere ciò che è possibile e ciò che è improbabile riguardo alle attività terroristiche o alle operazioni militari. Per quel tipo di analisi, ho bisogno di far affidamento sugli esperti. Tengo in grande considerazione le dichiarazioni di queste persone perché la maggior parte di queste ha speso gran parte della propria carriera nello studio dello spionaggio, del terrorismo, e delle operazioni militari in ogni parte del mondo e hanno progettato ed eseguito in prima persona attività militari e di intelligence per gli Stati Uniti. In altre parole, sono professionisti esperti, nei quali ho fiducia.

Il mio obiettivo, a questo punto, è quello di vedere il nostro governo dare inizio ad una nuova inchiesta, estremamente completa ed imparziale, sui terribili atti dell'11/9 e sugli eventi da loro scaturiti. Secondo la mia opinione, e secondo l'opinione delle persone competenti elencate sopra, l'attuale Rapporto della Commissione sul 11/9 è gravemente inadeguato nella spiegazione di ciò che realmente è successo.

Voglio inoltre precisare che nessuna delle informazioni presenti su questo sito web è il risultato di una qualunque indagine personale da parte mia. Ho semplicemente ricercato e compilato delle informazioni pubbliche disponibili su Internet. Voglio ringraziare quelli nel Movimento per la Verità sull'11/9 per i loro sforzi durante questi ultimi cinque anni, per la conduzione di un gran lavoro di ricerca e per mantenere vivo il Movimento davanti allo scherno e all'indifferenza.

Nell'interesse delle vittime dell'11/9, delle loro famiglie, del popolo americano, e nell'interesse della pace nel mondo, continuate per favore a ricercare la verità sull'11/9.

Cordialmente,

Alan Miller Settembre 2006 Email: alan.miller@PatriotsQuestion911.com


TORNA AL MENU PRINCIPALE




Powered by XOOPS 2.0 © 2001-2003 The XOOPS Project
Sponsor: Vorresti creare un sito web? Prova adesso con EditArea.   In cooperazione con Amazon.it   theme design: PHP-PROXIMA